Explore

Browse early cases and see where people can help make a lead stronger.

Start with the public examples available today, see what source types are in scope, and understand how Public Ledger organizes a jurisdiction for review, contribution, and follow-up.

Current public examples

Public Ledger is starting with a small set of organized jurisdictions so the review and reward workflow can be tested carefully. These are workflow examples, not a leaderboard of the biggest opportunities.

CityIL

City of Highland Park

Monitoring cadence: monthly. Public records are being organized for review and follow-up.

See the case study

Official benchmark pools

These benchmark pools explain where the public-money stakes are large enough to matter. They are not live opportunities until the record trail and next step are public.

Federal common buying and procurement

>$495B spent on common products and services in FY 2024

GAO reported that federal agencies spent more than $495 billion on common products and services in fiscal year 2024, while OMB reported more than $111 billion in savings since category management began.

How this shows up in real workLocally, this can show up in repeat vendors, price jumps for standard purchases, cooperative buying decisions, or contracts that should be easy to compare across agencies.

Unemployment insurance payment accuracy

14.41% national UI improper payment rate for the 2024 reporting period

The Department of Labor reported a 14.41% national improper payment rate for unemployment insurance in the 2024 reporting period and publishes state-level drilldowns for follow-up.

How this shows up in real workIn a real case, a contributor would look for the state-level reports, error categories, and agency explanations that show where payment accuracy is breaking down.

What kinds of sources are included?

Public Ledger organizes different evidence types so they can be reviewed together without flattening them into one generic record.

Agency Website

Used to support a source-linked review trail and help define what follow-up may still be needed.

How someone can strengthen a case

Exploring should not be a passive dead end. These are the kinds of inputs that turn a broad money story into a stronger, source-backed lead worth reviewing.

Find missing records

Bring the packet, contract, budget appendix, agenda backup, or official archive link that makes the case inspectable.

Add local context

Explain how a benchmark pool shows up in a real city, county, agency, or district so the record trail is easier to understand.

Help validate the lead

Compare documents, check dates and amounts, and help determine whether the lead deserves follow-up or should be dismissed.

Want to help expand Public Ledger? The next step is to join, bring records, or follow how the current public examples are being organized. New opportunities should pair public records with an official benchmark, a clear follow-up path, and rewardable work.